Earlier this month, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) issued a press release announcing that healthcare system Community Health Network Inc. (“Community”) agreed to pay $345 million to resolve allegations that it had violated the False Claims Act by knowingly submitting claims to Medicare for services that were referred to it in violation of the Stark Law. In connection with the settlement, Community also entered into a five-year Corporate Integrity Agreement with the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General.
https://fcablog.sidley.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2022/08/sidleyLogo-e1643922598198.png00Jaime L.M. Joneshttps://fcablog.sidley.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2022/08/sidleyLogo-e1643922598198.pngJaime L.M. Jones2023-12-27 14:05:582023-12-27 16:11:04DOJ Announces Largest Stark Law FCA Settlement Since 2006
A recent decision from the District of Minnesota applying the Eighth Circuit’s new but-for causation requirement for connecting violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) to FCA violations emphasizes the importance of the circuit split over the correct causation standard, while also highlighting challenges defendants can face post-Supervalu, particularly at the motion to dismiss stage, when arguing that their intent was inconsistent with the FCA’s scienter element. See United States ex rel. Louderback v. Sunovian Pharmaceuticals, Inc., No. 17-cv-1719 (D. Minn. Nov. 27, 2023). (more…)
DOJ Announces Largest Stark Law FCA Settlement Since 2006
Earlier this month, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) issued a press release announcing that healthcare system Community Health Network Inc. (“Community”) agreed to pay $345 million to resolve allegations that it had violated the False Claims Act by knowingly submitting claims to Medicare for services that were referred to it in violation of the Stark Law. In connection with the settlement, Community also entered into a five-year Corporate Integrity Agreement with the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General.
(more…)
Jaime L.M. Jones
Chicago
jaime.jones@sidley.com
Brenna E. Jenny
Catherine Stewart
Chicago
catherine.stewart@sidley.com
Court Requires But-For Causation for AKS-FCA Violations But Highlights Potential Defense Challenges from the Supervalu Decision
A recent decision from the District of Minnesota applying the Eighth Circuit’s new but-for causation requirement for connecting violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) to FCA violations emphasizes the importance of the circuit split over the correct causation standard, while also highlighting challenges defendants can face post-Supervalu, particularly at the motion to dismiss stage, when arguing that their intent was inconsistent with the FCA’s scienter element. See United States ex rel. Louderback v. Sunovian Pharmaceuticals, Inc., No. 17-cv-1719 (D. Minn. Nov. 27, 2023). (more…)
Jaime L.M. Jones
Chicago
jaime.jones@sidley.com
Brenna E. Jenny
Lauren E. McBride
Chicago
lmcbride@sidley.com
Categories
Courts
Archives